The PlexTrac alternative that starts at the deal.
PlexTrac is a mature, market-leading reporting and exposure-management platform, and it genuinely leads Cairn on remediation and CTEM workflow. But the engagement starts before the finding. Cairn covers the whole thing, scoping and SoWs through findings, reporting and delivery, on one data model, with a 2,400-plus finding library, published per-seat pricing and on-prem AI.
Reporting is table stakes. The lifecycle is the difference.
On core reporting and delivery, both are capable. The gap opens on everything around it: PlexTrac focuses on part of the engagement; Cairn owns the pre-sales, scoping and pricing that get you there, and the delivery that follows.
| Capability | Cairn | PlexTrac |
|---|---|---|
| Pentest reporting and findings library | ✓✓ | ✓✓ |
| Scanner imports | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Findings dedup and correlation | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Collaborative authoring with review workflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| Client delivery portal | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Retest cycles and remediation tracking | ✓ | ✓✓ |
| Pre-sales CRM and pipeline forecasting | ✓✓ | – |
| Scoping questionnaire that writes the SoW | ✓✓ | ◐ |
| Pricing models, proposals and e-signature | ✓✓ | – |
| On-prem / air-gapped AI drafting | ✓✓ | ◐ |
| Published pricing | ✓✓ | – |
| Self-host and SaaS | ✓✓ | ✓ |
PlexTrac marks are drawn from its public 2026 documentation and are directional, not hands-on tested. PlexTrac genuinely beats Cairn on remediation and CTEM workflow maturity (interactive remediation trackers, SLAs and CTEM analytics). Its prebuilt writeup corpus is also larger (25,000-plus versus Cairn’s 2,400-plus), though both libraries are deep. Cairn’s advantage is the pre-sales half of the engagement, which PlexTrac does not cover.
The number, up front.
Published, per seat, billed annually. On-prem from a stated $30,000/year floor. A five-person firm on the Team tier pays $745/month, all in — replacing a CRM, a proposal tool, e-signature, a reporting platform and a portal.
No public per-seat pricing; quote-only, packaged by use case (reporting, vulnerability management, CTEM). Third-party listings cite a rough starting point around $1,000+/month.
Walk the whole deal-to-delivery flow.
Take the two-minute product tour, or talk to us about migrating from PlexTrac and about on-prem deployment.
How Cairn compares to the rest of the field.
Is Cairn a good PlexTrac alternative?
For firms that want the whole engagement in one place, yes. PlexTrac is a mature, market-leading reporting and exposure-management platform, and it genuinely leads Cairn on remediation and CTEM workflow. But the engagement starts before the finding. Cairn covers the whole thing, scoping and SoWs through findings, reporting and delivery, on one data model, with a 2,400-plus finding library, published per-seat pricing and on-prem AI.
How does Cairn pricing compare to PlexTrac?
Cairn publishes per-seat pricing (Starter $99, Team $149, Business $249 per seat/month, on-prem from $30,000/year). PlexTrac: No public per-seat pricing; quote-only, packaged by use case (reporting, vulnerability management, CTEM). Third-party listings cite a rough starting point around $1,000+/month.
What does Cairn do that PlexTrac does not?
The pre-sales half of the engagement: a client CRM with pipeline forecasting, a scoping questionnaire that writes the Statement of Work, five pricing models and e-signature, on the same data model as findings, reporting and a white-label client portal, with on-prem AI drafting.
How does PlexTrac compare to Cairn overall?
PlexTrac genuinely beats Cairn on remediation and CTEM workflow maturity (interactive remediation trackers, SLAs and CTEM analytics). Its prebuilt writeup corpus is also larger (25,000-plus versus Cairn’s 2,400-plus), though both libraries are deep. Cairn’s advantage is the pre-sales half of the engagement, which PlexTrac does not cover.