Compare

Cairn vs the field.

Honest, sourced comparisons against the tools pentest firms actually weigh up. Every mark is grounded in the competitor’s own documentation, and we say plainly where one genuinely leads Cairn.

Cairn vs PlexTracContact salesPlexTrac genuinely beats Cairn on remediation and CTEM workflow maturity (interactive remediation trackers, SLAs and CTEM analytics).Cairn vs Dradis$79–$149 / user / moDradis matches Cairn on scanner imports and leads on connector extensibility (an open framework to add your own parsers, which Cairn’s fixed 40-parser set lacks).Cairn vs AttackForge~$50–$300 / mo (Core)We did not find a capability where AttackForge beats Cairn on the rows compared.Cairn vs PentestPad€49–€129 / pentester / moWe did not find a capability where PentestPad beats Cairn.Cairn vs Cyver CoreFrom $99 / moWe did not find a capability where Cyver beats Cairn.Cairn vs HexwayFree tier; from ~$78 / user / moWe did not find a capability where Hexway beats Cairn.Cairn vs RootshellContact salesRootshell genuinely beats Cairn on remediation-lifecycle analytics (SLA policies, breach tracking and MTTR) as a continuous-VM and CTEM platform, and matches Cairn on dedup with a continuous cross-vendor, exploit-intel flavor.Cairn vs GhostwriterFree (open source)Ghostwriter is free and open-source and leads on red-team operations Cairn does not target at all (C2/oplog integration, covert-infrastructure tracking).Cairn vs SysReptorFree / ~$770 / yr ProSysReptor’s HTML/CSS/Markdown report design is genuinely best-in-class, matching Cairn at the top of the reporting row on design flexibility.Cairn vs Checksec Canopy£550–£999 / user / yrWe did not find a capability where Canopy beats Cairn.

How we compare

Sourced from the vendor, not from us

Every mark on every comparison table is grounded in the competitor’s own public documentation, pricing page or release notes. Where a vendor does not publish something, we say so rather than guessing or marking it absent.

We name where they beat us

Four of the ten platforms here genuinely lead Cairn on a capability we compare, and each of those pages says which one and why. A comparison page that finds no fault with its own product is marketing, not a comparison.

The same rows every time

All ten pages score the same capability set, from pre-sales and scoping through findings, reporting, client delivery, deployment and AI. No cherry-picked rows chosen to flatter whichever tool is in the other column.

Pricing as published

We quote each vendor’s listed price where one exists and write “contact sales” where it does not, because quote-gating is itself a real difference between these products. Cairn’s own per-seat prices are on the pricing page.